4.8 Article

Iron and Sulfur Precursors Affect Crystalline Structure, Speciation, and Reactivity of Sulfidized Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 54, 期 20, 页码 13294-13303

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c03879

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF
  2. EPA under NSF [EF-1266252]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  4. Scientific Center for Optical and Electron Microscopy ScopeM of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETHZ

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reactivity of sulfidized nanoscale zerovalent iron (SNZVI) is affected by the amount and species of sulfur in the materials. Here, we assess the impact of the Fe (Fe2+ and Fe3+) and S (S2O42-, S-2(-), and S-6(2-)) precursors used to synthesize both NZVI and SNZVI on the resulting physicochemical properties and reactivity and selectivity with water and trichloroethene (TCE). X-ray diffraction indicated that the Fe precursors altered the crystalline structure of both NZVI and SNZVI. The materials made from the Fe3+ precursor had an expanded lattice in the Fe-0 body-centered-cubic (BCC) structure and lower electron-transfer resistance, providing higher reactivity with water (similar to 2-3 fold) and TCE (similar to 5-13 fold) than those made from an Fe2+ precursor. The choice of the S precursor controlled the S speciation in the SNZVI particles, as indicated by X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Iron disulfide (FeS2) was the main S species of SNZVI made from S2O42-, whereas iron sulfide (FeS) was the main S species of SNZVI made from S-2(-)/S-6(2)-. The former SNZVI was more hydrophobic, reactive with, and selective for TCE compared to the latter SNZVI. These results suggest that the Fe and S precursors can be used to select the conditions of the synthesis process and provide selected physicochemical properties (e.g., S speciation, hydrophobicity, and crystalline structure), reactivity, and selectivity of the SNZVI materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据