4.8 Article

Selective Ammonium Removal from Synthetic Wastewater by Flow-Electrode Capacitive Deionization Using a Novel K2Ti2O5-Activated Carbon Mixture Electrode

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 54, 期 19, 页码 12723-12731

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c04383

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51978369]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2019M650708]
  3. Shenzhen Municipal Science and Technology Innovation Council of Shenzhen Government, China [JCYJ20190809172805540, JCYJ20180508152004176]
  4. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Government [17210219, T21-711/16R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ammonium (NH4+) in wastewater is both a major pollutant and a valuable resource. Flow-electrode capacitive deionization (FCDI) is a promising technology for chemical-free and environmentally friendly NH4+ removal and recovery from wastewater. However, the coexisting sodium (Na+) in wastewater, with a similar hydrated radius to NH4+, competes for the adsorption sites, resulting in low NH4+ removal efficiency. Here, potassium dititanate (K2Ti2O5 or KTO) particles prepared by the electrospray method followed by calcination were mixed with activated carbon (AC) powder to form a novel KTO-AC flow-electrode for selective NH4+ removal over Na+. The mixed KTO-AC electrode exhibits a much higher specific gravimetric capacitance in NH4Cl solution than in NaCl solution. Compared with the pure AC electrode in the FCDI tests on NH4+ removal from synthetic wastewater, 25 wt % KTO addition in the electrode mixture increases the adsorption selectivity from 2.3 to 31 toward NH4+ over Na+, improves the NH4+ removal from 28.5% to 64.8% and increases the NH4+ desorption efficiency from 35.6% to over 80%, achieving selective NH4+ recovery and effective electrode regeneration. Based on DFT calculations, NH4+ adsorption on the K2Ti2O5 (0 0 1) surface is more thermodynamically favorable than that of Na+, which contributes to the high NH4+ adsorption selectivity observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据