4.7 Article

Tolerance of fifteen hydroponic ornamental plant species to formaldehyde stress

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 265, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115003

关键词

Hydroponic plant; Formaldehyde tolerance; Morphological response; Physiological response

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31770752]
  2. Jiangsu Province Engineering Technology Research Center Project [BM2013478]
  3. Fifth Stage Funded Research Project of 333 in Jiangsu Province [BRA2018065]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An indoor formaldehyde enriched environment was created by an automatic fumigation system with timing and concentration control. Selected hydroponic plant species were exposed in formaldehyde concentrations of 10 mg m(-3) , 50 mg m(-3) and 100 mg m(-3) respectively for 6 days with 10-h-treatment each day. Changes in morphological characteristics including leaf damage rate, leaf damage time and survival rate were monitored to evaluate morphological resistance to formaldehyde. Assessed physiological parameters were leaf chlorophyll content (Chl), leaf malondialdehyde content (MDA), activity of leaf formaldehyde dehydrogenase (FADH), leaf water soluble sugar content (WSS), and leaf proline content (Pro). Under formaldehyde suppression, reduction of Chl and increase of MDA and Pro were observed. Varying by species, FADH and WSS peaked at certain formaldehyde concentrations. A Principal Component Analysis (PCA) method was adopted to evaluate key factors in hydroponic plants' tolerance to formaldehyde. Among the 15 species selected, the best 5 performing species are Spathiphyllum floribundum, Alocasia cucullata, Davallia bullata, Syngonium podophyllum 'Pixie', and Schefflera octophylla. The study helps people to select the best ornamental plants for indoor air pollution control. The response of hydroponic plant species to formaldehyde was studied for eco-friendly indoor air pollution control. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据