期刊
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 265, 期 PT A, 页码 -出版社
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114850
关键词
OPEs; Air; Soil; Air-soil exchange; Source apportionment
资金
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [21976023, 41877401, 41673133]
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [DUT19LK43]
- Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resources and Environment [QA201945]
We investigated the concentrations, distributions, potential sources, and air-soil exchange of 10 OPFRs in the air and soil of Dalian. The concentrations of Sigma(10)OPERs in the soil were in the range of 1.07-288 ng/g (mean: 14.0 ng/g), while the concentrations of Sigma(10)OPERs in the passive air samples were in the range of 313-4760 pg/m(3) (mean: 1630 pg/m(3)). Generally, the concentrations of OPFRs are relatively high in urban areas compared with those in suburban and rural areas, indicating the influence of intensive anthropogenic activities on local OPFR concentrations. Tris(2-chloroisopropyl) phosphate (TCIPP) was the most abundant congener, followed by tris(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) and tri-n-butyl phosphate (TNBP). Spearman correlation analysis illustrated that OPFRs in the air shared common sources, while the sources of OPFRs in the soil were diverse. Net volatilization of TNBP from the soil to the air was observed at all sampling sites, whereas opposite trends were observed for TCIPP, TDCIPP, TBOEP, TPHP, EHDPP, TEHP, TPPO, and TMPP. The exchange trends of TCEP were characterized as volatilization in urban areas, but equilibrium in rural ones. TCEP showed the highest volatilization flux (1100 ng/m(3)/d), whereas TCIPP showed the highest deposition flux (-171 ng/m(3)/d). The significant diffusive fluxes of certain OPFRs, especially of those with suspected toxicities, suggested potential high exposure levels to these chemicals. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据