4.7 Article

Decisi-o-rama: An open-source Python library for multi-attribute value/ utility decision analysis

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
卷 135, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104890

关键词

MAUT/MAVT; Portfolio decision analysis; Multi-criteria decision analysis; Python

资金

  1. NWO domain TTW (the domain applied and Engineering Sciences of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) [15343]
  2. RIONED Foundation
  3. STOWA (Foundation for Applied Water Research)
  4. Knowledge Program Urban Drainage (KPUD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Environmental decisions are complex due to their multidimensional nature, involving multiple stakeholders and uncertain consequences. Decisi-o-rama, an open-source Python MCDA library, addresses the challenges by focusing on usability, uncertainty awareness, computational efficiency, and integration with portfolio decisions, facilitating the adoption of MCDA methods in environmental decision-making.
Environmental decisions are complex as they are multi-dimensional, highly interdisciplinary and not only involve multiple stakeholders with conflicting objectives, but also many possible alternatives with uncertain consequences. The difficulty lies in making trade-offs between tough value trade-offs on the one hand while appreciating uncertain impacts of alternatives on the other. To support decisions tackling such problems, a combination of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and environmental models is promising yet limited by the available MCDA software. Here, we present Decisi-o-rama, an open-source Python MCDA library for single and sets (portfolios) of alternatives in the context of multi-attribute value/utility theory (MAUT/MAVT). Its development was driven by four aspirations that are crucial for usability in the context of environmental decision-making: (1) interoperability, (2) uncertainty-awareness, (3) computational efficiency, and (4) integration with portfolio decisions. The results indicate that these aspirations are met, thus facilitating the adoption of MCDA methods by environmental researchers and practitioners.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据