4.5 Article

Monitoring of DDT in Agricultural Soils under Organic Farming in Poland and the Risk of Crop Contamination

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 66, 期 5, 页码 916-929

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-020-01347-9

关键词

Contamination source; DDT metabolites ratio; DDT monitoring; Plant residues uptake; Soil pollution

资金

  1. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of Poland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The analysis of 142 agricultural soil samples collected in organic farms across Poland with the intent to evaluate the level of DDT contamination resulted in more than 80% of the soils containing DDT. The sigma DDT (sum of all metabolites and isomers) concentration ranged between 0.005 and 0.383 mg/kg sigma DDT, with an average value of 0.064 mg/kg sigma DDT. However, the majority of plant samples collected from the crops growing on the sampled soils did not contain detectable DDT residues. The high DDT pollution levels detected in samples from four voivodeships (regions) among those monitored have been hypothesised to be linked to horticultural productions occurring to the sampled fields and typical of those regions, particularly in big-sized farms, during the period of DDT application, as well as the number of pesticides landfills present in these voivodeships. The elaboration of the o,p '-DDT/p,p '-DDT and DDT/(DDE + DDD) ratios to appraise the source or the period of contamination suggested that the contamination originated from past use of DDT rather than from impurities of more recent applications of other formulated substances. Such outcome thus suggests that the risk of contamination of organic products is likely derived from general environmental pollution levels rather than from the use of unauthorised substances in organic farming productions. Data from a trial with artificial contamination of soils indicated that using the DDT/(DDE + DDD) ratio in the presence of a low level of contamination could be less reliable than in highly contaminated soils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据