4.6 Article

Impact of water table fluctuations on the seasonal effectiveness of the pump-and-treat remediation in wet-dry tropical regions

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
卷 79, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-020-09182-1

关键词

Hydrocarbon contamination; LNAPL remediation; Pump-and-treat; LNAPL entrapment; Water table fluctuation; Hydrology of tropical climates

资金

  1. Basin Studies Laboratory (LEBAC) of the Department of Applied Geology
  2. Center for Environmental Studies (CEA) of UNESP
  3. Foundation for Development of UNESP (FUNDUNESP)
  4. National Counsel for Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq)
  5. CAPES-Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The pump-and-treat (P&T) method is a common remediation approach that is used to mitigate occurrences of hydrocarbon contamination. In a well-studied site that had been contaminated by a large volume of jet fuel, continuous monitoring of the water table and floating phase thickness revealed the most significant process governing the effectiveness of the site's active remediation system. The floating phase thickness recorded in the wells monitored varied greatly (> 0.50 m) and was negatively correlated with the water table level. Although the dependence of light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) thickness on water table fluctuations is widely recognized, LNAPL recovery, which is governed by alternating cycles of LNAPL release and entrapment in pore spaces, has been poorly described. Thus, we present a specific case in which LNAPL recovery is expected only episodically, when the water table falls sufficiently. In the period spanning from 2006 to 2008, LNAPL remediation recovered nearly 180 m(3) of oil. In later years, the volume of recovered LNAPL declined and ceased between 2010 and 2014, when the water table rose. Importantly, our research demonstrates that the P&T remediation approach is solely effective during a period of 4 months in dry years. Thus, cleanup methods and contaminated site management strategies should be reconsidered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据