4.7 Article

Assessment of energy and emission performance of a green scientific research building in Beijing, China

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 224, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110248

关键词

Life cycle analysis; Research building; Energy consumption; Greenhouse gas emissions

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Project of China [2018YFC07044]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71874121, 71373172, 71431005]
  3. Major projects of the National Social Science Fund (China) [17ZDA065]
  4. National Social Science Foundation of China [17BJY215]
  5. Humanities and Social Science Planning Fund Project of Ministry of Education (China) [15YJA790091]
  6. Tianjin Program of Philosophy and Social Science (Tianjin, China) [TJGL16-015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The building sector is critical to achieving China's energy conservation and emission reduction targets because it has contributed to more than 30% of the national energy consumption in the past decades. Green building construction has become a nationwide trend with the aim of energy conservation. The science research building of China State Construction Technical Center (CSCTC) has been labeled as the benchmark for energy conservation. Rendering the first-hand data, this study employs an ecological input-output model to analyze its life cycle energy and environmental performance. It further introduces scenario analysis and sensitivity analysis to study the critical factors that affect its energy consumption over its 50-year lifespan. This study has reached several conclusions. First, embodied energy and emissions dominate the life cycle energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in a green building. Whilst higher replacement frequency dominates increasing energy consumption, it is indispensable to maintain the well-being of research buildings. Second, installing a rooftop solar photovoltaic system could triple the effect of reducing emissions than that of changing power mix. Moreover, it is imperative to take the functional and safety requirements of research buildings into account when formulating policies. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据