Towards emissions certification systems for international trade in hydrogen: The policy challenge of defining boundaries for emissions accounting

Hydrogen as a fuel is clean burning, but production can cause substantial greenhouse emissions. Some buyers will prefer to pay a higher price to ensure purchase of low-embedded emissions hydrogen, but it is impossible to determine embedded emissions by examining the end product. Certification of embedded emissions will thus play a key role in the future of hydrogen as a low-emission energy carrier. The boundaries of the supply-chain elements covered in the emissions accounting of certification schemes will have substantial implications for emission-reduction incentives and international tradability. We review the boundary definitions of existing and emerging hydrogen certification schemes. Further, we provide an evidence-based assessment of the magnitude of emissions likely to occur within each boundary of the supply chain. We find varying approaches to boundary definitions in the surveyed schemes. The exclusion of feedstock or transport elements risks ignoring major fractions of supply-chain emissions. In order to balance tradability and emissions-reduction incentives, we recommend that hydrogen certification schemes be designed to follow a modular approach. This type of modular approach would place those with decision-making power over the relevant piece of the supply chain in the position of certifying the emissions within that supply-chain boundary. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Automated summary

Hydrogen as a fuel burns cleanly, but its production can lead to substantial greenhouse gas emissions. The certification of embedded emissions will be crucial for the future of hydrogen as a low-emission energy carrier. To balance tradability and emissions-reduction incentives, hydrogen certification schemes should adopt a modular approach.