4.7 Article

Reliability assessment and congestion management of power system with energy storage system and uncertain renewable resources

期刊

ENERGY
卷 215, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.119134

关键词

Energy storage system; Reliability; Congestion management; Renewable resources; Uncertainty

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper analyzes the impact of ESS capacity on power system reliability and congestion relief, optimizing the charging and discharging to mitigate uncertainties. The appropriate size of ESS is selected based on the trade-off between investment cost and changes in costs for various stakeholders in the power system.
The high penetration of Renewable Energy Sources (RES) makes the power system unreliable due to its uncertain nature and to deal with this uncertainties installation of an Energy Storage System (ESS) is suggested. In this paper, the quantifying impact of ESS capacity on power system network reliability and relieving the congestion is analyzed. The proposed reliability assessment and congestion relief problem is formulated by considering generation cost and demand interruption cost for N-1 contingency criteria. The proposed algorithm manages the optimal charging and discharging of ESS to mitigate the uncertainties associated with RES and relieving the congestion. The impact of ESS capacity on reliability indices Expected Energy not Supplied (EENS) and Expected interruption Cost (ECOST) for Generating Companies (GENCOs), Transmission Companies (TRANSCOs), customers, and entire power system are calculated. The appropriate size of ESS is selected by the trade-off between investment cost of ESS and percentage change in EENS and ECOST value for the entire power system, GENCOs, TRANSCOs, and customers. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is tested on the modified IEEE RTS 24 bus system. The problem is modeled in the Generic Algebraic Solver (GAMS) environment and solved using CONOPT as an NLP solver. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据