4.7 Article

Energy storage and attrition performance of limestone under fluidization during CaO/CaCO3 cycles

期刊

ENERGY
卷 207, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118291

关键词

Limestone; Thermochemical energy storage; Attrition; Fluidization; Calcium looping

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51876105]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds of Shandong University [2018JC039]
  3. Major Scientific and Technological Innovation Projects of Key R&D Programof Shandong Province [2019JZZY020118]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermochemical energy storage of CaO/CaCO3 system is a rapidly growing technology for application in concentrated solar power plant. In this work, the energy storage reactivity and attrition performance of the limestone during the energy storage cycles were investigated in a fluidized bed reactor. The effects of CO2 concentration, reaction temperature, fluidization velocity, particle size and number of cycles were discussed. With increasing CO2 concentration from 80% to 100%, the energy storage capacity and attrition rate of the limestone increase by 11% and 9%, respectively. The feasible carbonation and calcination temperatures are 850-870 degrees C and 800-850 degrees C, respectively. The energy storage capacity of the limestone improves with increasing fluidization velocity in carbonation stage. As the fluidization velocity increases from 0.04 to 0.06 m/s, the attrition rate of the limestone after 5 cycles increases by 96%. Smaller particles show higher energy storage and attrition resistance during the cycles. Further, the cyclic stability of the limestone carbonated at higher fluidization velocity is higher than that carbonated at static (solid-like) state. The limestone operated at the fluidization state exhibits a higher cyclic energy storage capacity than that at the static (solid-like) state. Higher fluidization velocity significantly mitigates the pore-plugging and sintering of the limestone. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据