4.7 Article

An allocative method of hybrid electrical and thermal energy storage capacity for load shifting based on seasonal difference in district energy planning

期刊

ENERGY
卷 207, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118139

关键词

Hybrid energy storage; Electrical energy storage; Thermal energy storage; Load shifting; Seasonal difference; District energy planning

资金

  1. National 13th Five-year Plan Key Project of Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2017YFB0903404]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Plan Project [19DZ1205800, 19DZ1205804]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The power generation of renewable energy represented by wind and solar energy on energy supply-side has uncertainty. Meanwhile, the fluctuation problems in power system is also caused by increasing number of air-conditioning loads on energy demanded-side. For addressing the fluctuation, energy storage technology is considered as a crucial solution. Energy storage technology can also improve the flexibility of the power system and reduce the peak-valley difference. However, a large scale of electrical energy storage has less economic. Hybrid energy (including electrical and thermal energy) storage can be seen as a practicable solution instead of electrical energy storage. An allocative method of hybrid energy storage capacity is proposed in this paper. By use of this method, the mathematical model is explored between hybrid energy storage capacity and peak-valley difference. It is convenient to determine the capacity of hybrid energy storage depending on peak valley difference required. Moreover, seasonal difference of electrical load can determine the capacity of electrical and thermal energy storage, respectively. In addition, the economy model of energy storage capacity helps to find out the optimal capacity. This proposed method can be used as an analysis tool of district energy planning and energy system renewal. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据