4.6 Article

Electrochemical detection of the synthetic cathinone 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone using carbon screen-printed electrodes: A fast, simple and sensitive screening method for forensic samples

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 354, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136728

关键词

Synthetic cathinone; Bath salts; Forensic analysis; Novel psychoactive substances (NPS); Voltammetry

资金

  1. CNPq [424432/2018-8]
  2. FAPEMIG [APQ-03637-16]
  3. FCT from the PhD Programme in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Innovation (i3DU) [PD/BD/127797/2016]
  4. FCT/MCTES through national funds [UID/QUI/50006/2019, UID/MULTI/04378/2019]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PD/BD/127797/2016] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the electrochemical detection of 3,4 methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV), a synthetic cathinone used as a stimulant drug, is presented for the first time. The electrochemical behavior of MDPV was studied by cyclic voltammetry (CV) at the surface of an unmodified glassy carbon electrode and a carbon graphite screen-printed electrode (SPE-Gr), where three irreversible oxidation processes were identified. The quantification of MDPV in seized drug samples was optimized for the first oxidation process (at + 0.6 V vs Ag) in 0.1 mol L-1 Britton Robison (BR) buffer solution pH 6.0 at SPE-Gr, using adsorptive stripping differential pulse voltammetry (AdSDPV) detection. The proposed method exhibited a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.5 mu mol L-1 and suitable electrochemical response stability using the same (N = 5) or different (N = 3) electrodes, both presenting a RSD lower than 1.6%. Additionally, interference studies and application to MDPV sensing in reference samples provided by United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) were performed, confirming the potential of the proposed sensor for application in forensic analysis as a simple, fast and cost-effective screening method for MDPV. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据