4.7 Article

Impacts of urbanization and landscape pattern on habitat quality using OLS and GWR models in Hangzhou, China

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106654

关键词

Habitat quality; Urbanization; Landscape pattern; Geographical weighted regression; Hangzhou

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41971236]
  2. Basic Public Welfare Research Program of Zhejiang Province, China [LGN18D010002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

China has experienced the most serious habitat degradation, especially in fast-growing metropolis cities. Although increasing attentions have been brought to this issue, we still lack the understanding of the quanti-tative impacts of urbanization and landscape pattern on habitats. In this study, we used the Integrated Valuation of Environmental Services and Trade-off (InVEST) model to evaluate the habitat quality in Hangzhou city. We further employed spatial auto-correlation to analyze its spatiotemporal pattern variation characteristics. Finally, the ordinary least squares (OLS) and geographically weighted regression (GWR) models were used to explore the impacts of urbanization and landscape pattern change on habitat quality. The results show that the habitat quality index of Hangzhou decreased from 0.608 to 0.577 during 2004-2015, and these areas mainly located around the suburb decreased significantly. The spatial distribution of habitat quality showed sig-nificantly positive spatial auto-correlation, and the overall spatial auto-correlation degree of the habitat quality increased during this time. Rapid urbanization has significant negative effects on habitat quality in various areas, while the magnitude and direction of the impacts of landscape pattern on habitat quality differed in time and space. These results provide decision-making criteria for formulating differential urban development policies and landscape management measures for urban ecological sustainability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据