4.7 Article

Carbazole based new organic dye recognizes hydrazine and hydrogen sulfide via signal difference protocols

期刊

DYES AND PIGMENTS
卷 181, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2020.108545

关键词

Ratiometric; Dual-response; Hydrazine; Hydrogen sulfide

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)-Guangdong Joint funding support [U1801256]
  2. Innovation team project by the Department of Education of Guangdong Province [2016KCXTD009]
  3. Scientific Research Fund of Henan Provincial Education Department [17A150016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Signal change strategy plays a primary role in the development of sensitive assay system. Deep insights into multiple signal responses will benefit the assembly of efficient sensors. Herein, we have developed a multi-functional fluorescent probe 24(5-(9-phenyl-9H-carbazol-3-yethiophen-2-yemethylene)malononitrile (SO-CN) for the detection of N2H4 and H2S with different emission channels. Initially, a broad band at 604 nm has been monitored and an orange-yellow fluorescence has been observed in DMSO/PBS system (3/2, v/v, pH 7.4). After treating with hydrazine (N2H4), only N2H4 can give rise to the special changes of SO-CN by the signals of ratiometric fluorescence (F-442/F-604) and colorimetric signals (bright yellow to colorless) with a low detection limit (42.5 nM). Moreover, the fluorescence intensity ratio F-532/F-604 of SO-CN exhibits an excellent linear equation with the concentration range (NaHS) from 0 to 400 mu M (detection limit = 0.77 mu M). In this way, SO-CN can be employed to recognize N2H4 and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) via the same excitation wavelength and different emission performance. The discriminative sensing behaviors of SO-CN for N2H4 and H2S are assigned to two mechanisms, which can be verified by H-1 NMR spectra, HR-MS spectra and density functional theory (DFT) calculation. Therefore, this molecular framework has pave new way for the detection of new target species with functional group controls.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据