4.7 Article

On numerical integration in isogeometric subdivision methods for PDEs on surfaces

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2016.01.005

关键词

Subdivision methods; Isogeometric analysis; PDEs on surfaces; Numerical quadrature

资金

  1. FWF in Austria [S117]
  2. DFG in Germany [Ru 567/14-1]
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [S117] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subdivision surfaces offer great flexibility in capturing irregular topologies combined with higher order smoothness. For instance, Loop and Catmull-Clark subdivision schemes provide C-2 smoothness everywhere except at extraordinary vertices, where the generated surfaces are C-1 smooth. The combination of flexibility and smoothness leads to their frequent use in geometric modeling and makes them an ideal candidate for performing isogeometric analysis of higher order problems with irregular topologies, e.g. thin shell problems. In the neighborhood of extraordinary vertices, however, the resulting surfaces (and the functions defined on them) are non-polynomial. Thus numerical integration based on quadrature has to be performed carefully to preserve the expected higher order consistency. This paper presents a detailed case study of different quadrature schemes for isogeometric discretizations of partial differential equations on closed surfaces with Loop's subdivision scheme. As model problems we consider elliptic equations with the Laplace-Beltrami and the surface bi-Laplacian operator as well as the associated eigenvalue problem for the Laplace-Beltrami operator. A particular emphasis is on the robustness of the approach in the vicinity of extraordinary vertices. Based on a series of numerical experiments, different quadrature schemes are compared. Mid-edge quadrature, which can easily be implemented via a lookup table, turns out to be a preferable choice due to its robustness and efficiency. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据