4.5 Review

Update on gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

期刊

DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE
卷 53, 期 2, 页码 171-182

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.08.031

关键词

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms; Active surveillance; Endoscopic resection; Surgery

资金

  1. Gioja Bianca Costanza Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The incidence of GEP-NENs has increased over the past three decades, leading to a variety of treatment options including conservative management, surgical resection, and medical therapies based on disease characteristics.
The incidence gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) has dramatically risen over the last three decades, probably due to the increased detection of asymptomatic lesions. The diagnostic work-up for patients with suspected GEP-NENs is based on conventional imaging, endoscopy, pathology, and functional imaging, including (68)Gallium-DOTATATE PET and F-18-FDG PET. The choice of the best treatment strategy should be based on the evaluation of tumor-related features and patient's characteristics. A conservative management, consisting of active surveillance or endoscopic resection, has been advocated for patients with small, incidentally discovered, nonfunctioning tumors without features of aggressiveness. On the other hand, surgery with lymphadenectomy, also with a minimally invasive approach, represents the gold standard for the curative treatment of localized disease. Moreover, surgical resection plays an important role also in the context of a multimodal treatment strategy for patients with advanced GEP-NENs. Finally, a wide range of medical therapies, comprising somatostatin analogues, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, target therapies and several chemotherapy regimens, can be offered to patients with advanced GEP-NENs not amenable of surgical resection, according to the biological and molecular features of their disease. (C) 2020 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据