4.2 Article

Diagnostic significance of flow cytometry scales in diagnostics of myelodysplastic syndromes

期刊

CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY
卷 100, 期 3, 页码 312-321

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21965

关键词

aplastic anemia; cytopenia; flow cytometry; hematology; myelodysplastic syndrome; paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria; ROC-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to determine the optimal MFC approach for MDS and found that iFC is a useful diagnostic tool in MDS, especially in low-grade MDS. The results support the utility of iFC in the diagnosis of MDS.
Background Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) can present a challenge for clinicians. Multicolor flow cytometry (MFC) can aid in establishing a diagnosis. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal MFC approach for MDS. Methods The study included 102 MDS (39 low-grade MDS), 83 cytopenic patients without myeloid neoplastic disorders (control group), and 35 healthy donors. Bone marrow was analyzed using a six-color MFC. Analysis was conducted according to the Ogata score, Wells score, and the integrated flow cytometry (iFC) score. Results The respective sensitivity and specificity values were 77.5% and 90.4% for the Ogata score, 79.4% and 81.9% for the Wells score, and 87.3% and 87.6% for the iFC score. Specificity was not 100% due to deviations of MFC parameters in the control group. Patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) had higher levels of CD34(+)CD7(+)myeloid cells than donors. Aplastic anemia and PNH were characterized by a high proportion of CD56(+)cells among CD34(+)precursors and neutrophils. The proportion of MDS-related features increased with the progression of MDS. The highest number of CD34(+)blasts was found in MDS with excess blasts. MDS with isolated del(5q) was characterized by a high proportion of CD34(+)CD7(+)cells and low granularity of neutrophils. In 39 low-grade MDS, the sensitivities were 53.8%, 61.5%, and 71.8% for Ogata score, Wells score, and iFC, respectively. Conclusion The results support iFC as a useful diagnostic tool in MDS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据