4.7 Article

Software for computerised analysis of cardiotocographic traces

期刊

COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 121-137

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.10.008

关键词

Computerised cardiotocography; Foetal heart rate variability; Nonlinear indices; FHR clinical analysis; Software performance; Matlab

资金

  1. project Sviluppo di sistemi per il monitoraggio fetale domiciliare - Legge 5 of Campania Region
  2. DRIVE IN2 project - Italian National Programme Piano Operativo Nazionale Ricerca e Competitivita

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the widespread use of cardiotocography in foetal monitoring, the evaluation of foetal status suffers from a considerable inter and intra-observer variability In order to overcome the main limitations of visual cardiotocographic assessment, computerised methods to analyse cardiotocographic recordings have been recently developed. In this study, a new software for automated analysis of foetal heart rate is presented. It allows an automatic procedure for measuring the most relevant parameters derivable from cardiotocographic traces. Simulated and real cardiotocographic traces were analysed to test software reliability. In artificial traces, we simulated a set number of events (accelerations, decelerations and contractions) to be recognised. In the case of real signals, instead, results of the computerised analysis were compared with the visual assessment performed by 18 expert clinicians and three performance indexes were computed to gain information about performances of the proposed software. The software showed preliminary performance we judged satisfactory in that the results matched completely the requirements, as proved by tests on artificial signals in which all simulated events were detected from the software. Performance indexes computed in comparison with obstetricians' evaluations are, on the contrary, not so satisfactory; in fact they led to obtain the following values of the statistical parameters: sensitivity equal to 93%, positive predictive value equal to 82% and accuracy equal to 77%. Very probably this arises from the high variability of trace annotation carried out by clinicians. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据