4.5 Review

Potential Cardio-Protective Agents: A Resveratrol Review (2000-2019)

期刊

CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN
卷 27, 期 26, 页码 2943-2955

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1381612826666200909125354

关键词

Resveratrol; cardiovascular disease; bioavailability; nanotechnology; DDS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With a projected 23.6 million deaths per year by 2030, cardiovascular disease presents a significant need for novel compounds to prevent or treat the disease. Research on the use of resveratrol and its analogues as cardioprotective agents, as well as the role of nanotechnology in overcoming physicochemical limitations, is crucial in addressing this pressing issue.
With a 2030 projection of 23.6 million deaths per year, the prevalence and severity of cardiovascular disease are astoundingly high. Thus, there is a definitive need for the identification of novel compounds with the potential to prevent or treat the disease and associated states. Moreover, there is also an ever-increasing need for drug delivery systems (DDS) that cope with poor and ranging physiochemical properties of therapeutic compounds to achieve the clinical effect. The usage of resveratrol (RES) is a growing area of interest with innumerate pieces of research, evidencing the drug's efficacy. This drug is, however, marred; its notably poor physiochemical properties (namely poor water solubility) limit its use for oral drug delivery. RES analogues, however, potentially possess superior physiochemical characteristics offering a remedy for the aforementioned drawback. However, particulate based DDS are equally able to offer property amelioration and targeting. This review offers an extensive examination into the role of RES as a potential cardioprotective agent. The prevalence and suitability of associated analogues and the role of nanotechnology in overcoming physicochemical boundaries, particularly through the development of nanoparticulate formulations, will be discussed in detail.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据