4.7 Article

An immune-inspired semi-supervised algorithm for breast cancer diagnosis

期刊

COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE
卷 134, 期 -, 页码 259-265

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2016.07.020

关键词

Breast cancer diagnosis; Artificial immune; Machine learning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61472092, 11271097, 61100150]
  2. Creation Team Construction Project of Guangdong Province University [2015KCXTD014]
  3. Scientific Research Fund of Sichuan Provincial Education Department [13TD0014]
  4. Scientific Research Fund of Leshan Normal University [Z1412]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Breast cancer is the most frequently and world widely diagnosed life-threatening cancer, which is the leading cause of cancer death among women. Early accurate diagnosis can be a big plus in treating breast cancer. Researchers have approached this problem using various data mining and machine learning techniques such as support vector machine, artificial neural network, etc. The computer immunology is also an intelligent method inspired by biological immune system, which has been successfully applied in pattern recognition, combination optimization, machine learning, etc. However, most of these diagnosis methods belong to a supervised diagnosis method. It is very expensive to obtain labeled data in biology and medicine. In this paper, we seamlessly integrate the state-of-the-art research on life science with artificial intelligence, and propose a semi-supervised learning algorithm to reduce the need for labeled data. We use two well-known benchmark breast cancer datasets in our study, which are acquired from the UCI machine learning repository. Extensive experiments are conducted and evaluated on those two datasets. Our experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed algorithm, which proves that our algorithm is a promising automatic diagnosis method for breast cancer. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据