4.7 Article

Hierarchically Structured Spherulitic Cobalt Hydroxide Carbonate as a Precursor to Ordered Nanostructures of Electrocatalytically Active Co3O4

期刊

CRYSTAL GROWTH & DESIGN
卷 20, 期 10, 页码 6407-6420

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.cgd.0c00576

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [LU 1445/2-1, SFB 840-B9, SFB-1333, 358283783]
  2. Carl Zeiss Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With their tendency to form low-dimensional materials with high surface area, cobalt hydroxide carbonates represent an important class of precursors to Co3O4-a heterogeneous catalyst with various applications including sustainable energy conversion. We here present a facile methodology for the room temperature precipitation of cobalt hydroxide carbonate under additive-free conditions. Upon aging in aqueous solution, the initially deposited amorphous bulk solid slowly transforms into macroscopic crystals with an unusual spherulitic morphology interfacially templated by glass surfaces. Most intriguingly, the individual branches of these hemispherical particles represent highly anisometric, elongated platelets reaching millimeter dimensions along the growth direction, while their lamellar architecture indicates the formation of a layered double hydroxide structure. Gradual substitution of Co(II) with Mn(II) results in the deposition of spheroidal stoichiometric carbonates with a calcite structure, in which the crystal lattice progressively expands with increasing Mn content. Replacement of Co(II) by Ni(II), in contrast, preserves the spherulite morphology at low Ni(II) content (Co/Ni > 1), but prevents precipitate maturation at higher proportions of Ni(II). Calcination converts the hydroxide carbonate precursor into hierarchical Co3O4 spherulites with superstructures composed of interconnected nanoparticles, where this nanoscale arrangement is shown to positively affect the electrocatalytic activity toward the oxygen evolution reaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据