4.5 Article

Did the Benue Trough connect the Gulf of Guinea with the Tethys Ocean in the Cenomanian? New evidence from the palynostratigraphy of the Yola Sub-basin

期刊

CRETACEOUS RESEARCH
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2020.104683

关键词

Trans-Sahara; Late Cretaceous; Palynomorphs; Biostratigraphy; Benue Trough; Nigeria; Failed rift

资金

  1. Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study combines field observations and palynostratigraphy to refine the stratigraphy of Upper Cretaceous deposits in the Yola Sub-basin, revealing the presence of five palynozones and indicating intercontinental water body mixing during the Cenomanian stage.
The Yola Sub-basin represents the lower portion of the bifurcated Upper Benue Trough, whose origin has been linked to the opening of the Atlantic Ocean in the Mesozoic. The sub-basin fill consists predominantly of siliciclastic and carbonate deposits, the ages of which have remained controversial until now. This work employs field observations integrated with palynostratigraphy to refine the stratigraphy of these Upper Cretaceous deposits. We delineate five palynozones, spanning the upper Albian -Cenomanian, middle Cenomanian, upper Cenomanian, Turonian and Coniacian-Santonian. This palynology indicates that rocks previously thought to be Turonian are in fact Cenomanian. Further, the species Florentinia berran, Florentinia khaldunii, and Subtilisphaera senegalensis are all low latitude dinocysts that previously have only been reported from the Tethyan realm. Their presence here, together with the sedimentology, implies that there was an influx of Tethyan waters into the epeiric sea of the Benue Trough in the Cenomanian. The collective sedimentary and palynological evidence indicates that the Cenomanian transgression was well established in the Yola Sub-basin, and more broadly in the Upper Benue Trough, connecting Tethys with the Gulf of Guinea. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据