4.7 Article

Effect of polysaccharides on setting and rheological behavior of gypsum-based materials

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 267, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120922

关键词

Polysaccharides; Rheology; Setting; Adsorption; Microstructure

资金

  1. Foundation of China National Nature Science [51578141]
  2. 973 Program [2015CB655102]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2016YFE0118200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of two polysaccharides, HPS and HPMC, on the setting and rheological behavior of gypsum-based materials. It was found that HPS mainly adsorbed on hemihydrate gypsum particles and could act as a thickener and setting accelerator within a certain dosage range, while HPMC dispersed in interstitial solutions and viscosified them, also acting as a thickener and setting accelerator in all dosages range.
In this study, the effect of two polysaccharides including hydroxypropyl starch (HPS) and hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) on setting and rheological behavior of gypsum-based materials (GM) pastes were investigated through a series of setting and rheological property tests and microstructure characterization. The results show that HPS is mainly adsorbed on hemihydrate gypsum particles and can promote flocculation or deflocculation structures in different dosages range, as a consequence behaving as a thickener and setting accelerator below the critical dosage of 0.02 wt%, while acting as a retarder beyond this dosage. Besides, the excess HPS would be also selectively adsorbed on dihydrate gypsum crystals and result in the oriented growth. By comparison, HPMC tends to disperse in interstitial solutions and can wrap plenty of free water inside their structures, viscosifying interstitial solutions and strengthening flocculation structures simultaneously. Therefore HPMC has thickening and setting accelerating effects in all dosages range. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据