4.7 Review

Factors affecting the effectiveness of internal curing: A review

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 267, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121017

关键词

Internal curing; Cement-based materials; Autogenous shrinkage; Water absorption and desorption; Pore structure

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [2018YFC0705400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides an overview of factors affecting the effectiveness of internal curing in cement-based materials, focusing on the amount of internal curing water, characteristics of internal curing materials, and migration distance of internal curing water. Observations include the inability of certain equations to completely reduce autogenous shrinkage, the significance of water release characteristics of internal curing materials, and the unexpected effects on concrete properties when internal curing materials do not match the pore structure of the mixture.
This paper mainly gives an overview of factors affecting the effectiveness of internal curing in cement-based materials from three aspects: the amount of internal curing water, characteristics of internal curing materials, and migration distance of internal curing water. It was found that (i) the equation developed to calculate the requirement of internal curing water for concretes with different water to cement ratios (w/c) based on Power's model that includes silica fume and to get a maximum degree of hydration by prewetted lightweight (LWA) could not completely reduce autogenous shrinkage, (ii) the water release characteristics of internal curing materials (e.g., the time to release and the distance to migrate) under uniformly distributed conditions may override the influence of the spacing factor, and (iii) unexpected effects resulting from internal curing on the properties of concrete may occur if the characteristics of internal curing materials do not match the pore structure of concrete mixture. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据