4.7 Article

Effect of shrinkage reducing admixture on creep of recycled aggregate concrete

期刊

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
卷 254, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119312

关键词

Recycled aggregate; Concrete; Creep; Shrinkage reducing admixture; Microstructure

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY20E020006]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51602198]
  3. International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Project of Shaoxing University [2019LGGH1009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is widely accepted that recycled concrete aggregates originated from construction and demolition wastes are promising materials to contribute to the conservation and rational use of natural resources as well as the protection of the environment. In this work, a comprehensive experimental investigation has been carried out in order to assess the effect of shrinkage reducing admixture (SRA) on the mechanical properties and creep of concrete manufactured with recycled coarse aggregates from the different parent concrete with compressive strengths of 30 MPa and 80 MPa, respectively. Meanwhile, mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) have been performed to determine the variation of internal microstructure. The results indicate that the quality of recycled aggregates has important effect on the properties of concrete. The addition of SRA furtherly reduces the early mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete, and however, improves the later mechanical and creep properties. Compared with the reference concrete manufactured with natural coarse aggregates, concrete manufactured with SRA and recycled coarse aggregates with high quality exhibits the later higher compressive strength and elastic modulus as well as lower creep, which is largely due to the later more compact microstructure such as interfacial transition zone and pore structure. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据