4.7 Article

Multi-class fruit-on-plant detection for apple in SNAP system using Faster R-CNN

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105634

关键词

Branch/wire-occluded fruit; Deep learning; Data augmentation; Multi-class detection; Robotic harvesting

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M663832]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [2452020170]
  3. Key Research and Development Program in Shaanxi Province of China [2018TSCXL-NY-05-04, 2019ZDLNY02-04]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31971805]
  5. International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Foundation of Northwest AF University [A213021803]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deep learning achieved high success of fruit-on-plant detection such as on apple. Most of studies on apple detection identified all target fruits as one class regardless of fruit condition and other canopy objects. However, some detected fruits were physically occluded by branches or trellis wires that could diminish the effectiveness of fruit picking and even damage the end-effector, especially when high-vigor rootstock apple cultivar was used. A multi-class apple detection method in dense-foliage fruiting-wall trees was thus proposed based on Faster Region-Convolutional Neural Network. It detected apples in different conditions such as non-occluded, leaf-occluded, branch/wire-occluded, and fruit-occluded fruit. A total of 800 images were acquired and then augmented to 12,800 images. Average precision of non-occluded, leaf-occluded, branch/wire-occluded, and fruit-occluded fruit were 0.909, 0.899, 0.858, and 0.848, respectively. Overall, the mean average precision of the four classes was 0.879, and an average of 0.241 s was needed to process an image. The results indicated that all the apples in different classes could be effectively detected, which can help the robot to decide the picking strategy (e.g., picking order and path planning) as well as to avoid the potential damage by the branches and trellis wires.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据