4.7 Article

Hydro-mechanical simulation of the saturated and semi-saturated porous soil-rock mixtures using the numerical manifold method

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113238

关键词

Soil-rock mixture; Semi-saturated porous media; Two-phase fluid flow; Fractured porous media; Numerical manifold method

资金

  1. Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS, China [2020327]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51609240, 11572009, 51538001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dynamics of the widespread saturated and semi-saturated soil-rock mixtures (SRMs) are of importance in practical engineering. In this paper, a numerical manifold model is presented for hydro-mechanical simulation of the saturated and semi-saturated SRMs. In the case of the semi-saturated SRMs, the model is based on the generalized Biot theory involving immiscible two-phase wetting and non-wetting fluids in deformable porous media. The wetting, non-wetting fluid pressure and skeleton displacement are chosen to be primary variables which are related to the wetting and non-wetting saturation and permeability by experimental relationships. For the mechanical problem, the material interfaces between soil and rock are deemed discontinuous by imposing a stick-slip contact constraint using an augmented Lagrange multiplier approach. For the hydraulic problem, the material interfaces are continuous for the fluid pressure and flux fields. Within the framework of the numerical manifold method (NMM), the discretized model including the interfacial discontinuities always can be established using the triangular mesh and the lumped mass representation is always available to increase computational efficiency. Besides the benchmark problems of saturated and semi-saturated porous media, two examples of soil-rock foundation and slope are performed to demonstrate the versatility and robustness of the model and to investigate the hydro-mechanical responses of the porous SRMs. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据