4.7 Review

Metaproteomics insights into traditional fermented foods and beverages

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12601

关键词

analytical methods; fermentation; foods and beverages; metaproteomics; microbiome

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30530055]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFD0400503]
  3. National First-Class Discipline Program of Light Industry Technology and Engineering [LITE2018-12]
  4. Top Talents Science and Technology Support Project of Education Department of Guizhou Province [KY[2018]082]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional fermented foods and beverages (TFFB) are important dietary components. Multi-omics techniques have been applied to all aspects of TFFB research to clarify the composition and nutritional value of TFFB, and to reveal the microbial community, microbial interactions, fermentative kinetics, and metabolic profiles during the fermentation process of TFFB. Because of the advantages of metaproteomics in providing functional information, this technology has increasingly been used in research to assess the functional diversity of microbial communities. Metaproteomics is gradually gaining attention in the field of TFFB research because it can reveal the nature of microorganism function at the protein level. This paper reviews the common methods of metaproteomics applied in TFFB research; systematically summarizes the results of metaproteomics research on TFFB, such as sauces, wines, fermented tea, cheese, and fermented fish; and compares the differences in conclusions reached through metaproteomics versus other omics methods. Metaproteomics has great advantages in revealing the microbial functions in TFFB and the interaction between the materials and microbial community. In the future, metaproteomics should be further applied to the study of functional protein markers and protein interaction in TFFB; multi-omics technology requires further integration to reveal the molecular nature of TFFB fermentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据