4.5 Article

Impacts of dark energy on constraining neutrino mass after Planck 2018

期刊

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1572-9494/abbb84

关键词

neutrino mass; mass hierarchies of neutrinos; dark energy; cosmological constraints; Planck 2018

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11975072, 11875102, 11835009, 11690021]
  2. Liaoning Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1905011]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N2005030]
  4. Top- Notch Young Talents Program of China [W02070050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Considering the mass splittings of three active neutrinos, we investigate how the properties of dark energy affect the cosmological constraints on the total neutrino mass Sigma m(nu) using the latest cosmological observations. In this paper, several typical dark energy models, including Lambda CDM, wCDM, CPL, and HDE models, are discussed. In the analysis, we also consider the effects from the neutrino mass hierarchies, i.e. the degenerate hierarchy (DH), the normal hierarchy (NH), and the inverted hierarchy (IH). We employ the current cosmological observations to do the analysis, including the Planck 2018 temperature and polarization power spectra, the baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), the type Ia supernovae (SNe), and the Hubble constant H-0 measurement. In the Lambda CDM+ Sigma m(nu) model, we obtain the upper limits of the neutrino mass Sigma m(nu) < 0.123 eV (DH), Sigma m(nu) < 0.156 eV (NH), and Sigma m(nu) < 0.185 eV (IH) at the 95% C.L., using the Planck+BAO+SNe data combination. For the wCDM+Sigma m(nu) model and the CPL+Sigma m(nu) model, larger upper limits of Sigma m(nu) are obtained compared to those of the Lambda CDM+Sigma m(nu) model. The most stringent constraint on the neutrino mass, Sigma m(nu) < 0.080 eV (DH), is derived in the HDE+Sigma m(nu) model. In addition, we find that the inclusion of the local measurement of the Hubble constant in the data combination leads to tighter constraints on the total neutrino mass in all these dark energy models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据