期刊
COMBUSTION AND FLAME
卷 226, 期 -, 页码 505-522出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.08.014
关键词
Pressure response; Heat release; Analytical solution; Helmholtz number; Gaussian distribution; Combustion instability
类别
资金
- Center of Excellence [FA9550-17-1-0195]
- Obra Social la Caixa Fellowship Program
This study analyzes the pressure response to an unsteady heat release source in an unconfined one-dimensional domain. The analytical model predicts two pressure response regimes based on the Helmholtz number, with a critical number dictating the transition between the two regimes. The results are representative of extreme conditions in a rocket combustor and show good agreement between analytical models and numerical simulations, with slight differences attributed to neglected flow property variations and loss mechanisms.
This paper analyzes the pressure response to an unsteady heat release source in an unconfined onedimensional domain. An analytical model based on the acoustic wave equation with an unsteady heat source is derived, and then compared against results from highly-resolved numerical simulations. Two different heat release profiles, a Gaussian spatial distribution with either a step or a Gaussian temporal distribution, are used to model the heat source. The analytical solutions predict two regimes in the pressure response depending on the Helmholtz number, which is defined as the ratio of the acoustic time over the duration of the heat release pulse. A critical Helmholtz number is found to dictate the pressure response regime. For compact cases, in the subcritical regime, the amplitude of the pressure pulse remains constant in space. For noncompact cases, above the critical Helmholtz number, the pressure pulse reaches a maximum at the center of the heat source, and then decays in space converging to a lower far field amplitude. At the limits of very small and very large Helmholtz numbers, the heat release response tends to be a constant pressure process and a constant volume process, respectively. The parameters of the study are chosen to be representative of the extreme conditions in a rocket combustor. The analytical models for both heat source profiles closely match the simulations with a slight overprediction. The differences observed in the analytical solutions are due to neglecting mean flow property variations and the absence of loss mechanisms. The numerical simulations also reveal the presence of nonlinear effects such as weak shocks that cannot be captured by the linear acoustic wave equation. (c) 2020 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据