4.7 Article

Forsythoside A protects against lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury through up-regulating microRNA-124

期刊

CLINICAL SCIENCE
卷 134, 期 19, 页码 2549-2563

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/CS20200598

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81903886, 81730110, 81973544, 81573671]
  2. Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme [GDHVPS2018]
  3. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2019A1515010821]
  4. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CACM [2019-QNRC2-C14]
  5. Guangzhou Education Bureau University Scientific Research Project [201831845]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute lung injury (ALI) is a life-threatening disease without effective pharmacotherapies, so far. Forsythia suspensa is frequently used in the treatment of lung infection in traditional Chinese medicine. In search for natural anti-inflammatory components, the activity and the underlying mechanism of Forsythoside A (FA) from Forsythia suspensa were explored. In the present paper, BALB/c mice and murine RAW 264.7 cells were stimulated by LPS to establish inflammation models. Data showed that FA inhibited the production of TNF-alpha and IL-6 and the activation of STAT3 in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. Additionally, FA increased the expression level of microRNA-124 (miR-124). Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of FA on STAT3 was counteracted by the treatment of miR-124 inhibitor. Critically, FA ameliorated LPS-induced ALI pathological damage, the increase in lung water content and inflammatory cytokine, cells infiltration and activation of the STAT3 signaling pathway in BALB/c mice. Meanwhile, FA up-regulated the expression of miR-124 in lungs, while administration with miR-124 inhibitor attenuated the protective effects of FA. Our results indicated that FA alleviates LPS-induced inflammation through up-regulating miR-124 in vitro and in vivo. These findings indicate the potential of FA and miR-124 in the treatment of ALI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据