4.6 Article

Deficits in monitoring self-produced speech in Parkinson's disease

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 131, 期 9, 页码 2140-2147

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.05.038

关键词

Parkinson's disease; Speech deficit; Corollary discharge; Efference copy; Hypophonia; Dysarthria

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [308533]
  2. Academy of Finland (AKA) [308533, 308533] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Speech deficits are common in Parkinson's disease, and behavioural findings suggest that the deficits may be due to impaired monitoring of self-produced speech. The neural mechanisms of speech deficits are not well understood. We examined a well-documented electrophysiological correlate of speech self-monitoring in patients with Parkinson's disease and control participants. Methods: We measured evoked electroencephalographic responses to self-produced and passively heard sounds (/a/ phonemes) in age-matched controls (N = 18), and Parkinson's disease patients who had minor speech impairment, but reported subjectively experiencing no speech deficits (N = 17). Results: During speaking, auditory evoked activity 100 ms after phonation (N1 wave) was less suppressed in Parkinson's disease than controls when compared to the activity evoked by passively heard phonemes. This difference between the groups was driven by increased amplitudes to self-produced phonemes, and reduced amplitudes passively heard phonemes in Parkinson's disease. Conclusions: The finding indicates that auditory evoked activity is abnormally modulated during speech in Parkinson's patients who do not subjectively notice speech impairment. This mechanism could play a role in producing speech deficits in as the disease progresses. Significance: Our study is the first to show abnormal early auditory electrophysiological correlates of monitoring speech in Parkinson's disease patients. (C) 2020 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据