4.3 Article

Chronic opioid use is associated with increased postoperative urinary retention, length of stay and non-routine discharge following lumbar fusion surgery

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY
卷 197, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106161

关键词

Chronic opioid use; Urinary retention; Lumbar fusion; Length of stay; Hospital discharge

资金

  1. Dr. Henry Cooke Drury Student Research Fellowship at Trinity College Dublin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The incidence of chronic opioid use (COU) is increasing with health related complications impacting both patients and healthcare services. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the impact of COU on postoperative urinary retention (PUR) in patients following lumbar fusion surgery as well as its impact on length of stay (LOS) and non-routine discharges (NRD). Materials & Methods: The State Inpatient Databases were utilised to identify patients undergoing elective lumbar fusion procedures. Patients with and without COU were separated into groups and matched using 3:1 propensity score matching. PUR, LOS in the upper quartile and discharge to a location other than home were the outcomes of interest. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the impact of COU on the above outcomes and Wald chi-square tests were used to determine the factors with the most significant associations. Results: COU was significant for PUR (p = 0.037), prolonged LOS (p < 0.001), and NRD (p = < 0.001). Factors most significantly associated with PUR were Elixhauser Mortality Index and COU both with p < 0.05. Factors associated with prolonged LOS and NRD were Elixhauser Mortality Index, COU, and insurance status. Conclusion: COU has a notable impact on PUR, LOS, and NRD. The Elixhauser Mortality Index and insurance status of patients also showed predictive utility for these outcomes. This knowledge enables us to identify sources of pressure for health services and approach them strategically through increased awareness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据