4.7 Article

Hydroxychloroquine for Early Treatment of Adults With Mild Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

期刊

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 73, 期 11, 页码 E4073-E4081

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1009

关键词

hydroxychloroquine; SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; therapy; randomized controlled trial

资金

  1. crowdfunding campaign JoEmCorono
  2. Laboratorios Rubio
  3. Laboratorios Gebro Pharma
  4. Zurich Seguros
  5. SYNLAB Barcelona
  6. Generalitat de Catalunya
  7. Foundation Dorneur

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study conducted in Spain showed that early treatment with hydroxychloroquine did not bring more benefits than usual care for patients with mild COVID-19. The treatment did not reduce the risk of hospitalization or shorten the time to complete resolution of symptoms.
Background. No effective treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) exist. We aimed to determine whether early treatment with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) would be efficacious for outpatients with COVID-19. Methods. Multicenter open-label, randomized, controlled trial conducted in Catalonia, Spain, between 17 March and 26 May 2020. Patients recently diagnosed with <5-day of symptom onset were assigned to receive HCQ (800 mg on day 1 followed by 400 mg once daily for 6 days) or usual care. Outcomes were reduction of viral load in nasopharyngeal swabs up to 7 days after treatment start, disease progression up to 28 days, and time to complete resolution of symptoms. Adverse events were assessed up to 28 days. Results. A total of 293 patients were eligible for intention-to-treat analysis: 157 in the control arm and 136 in the intervention arm. The mean age was 41.6 years (SD, 12.6), mean viral load at baseline was 7.90 log 10 copies/mL (SD, 1.82), and median time from symptom onset to randomization was 3 days. No differences were found in the mean reduction of viral load at day 3 (-1.41 vs -1.41 log 10 copies/mL in the control and intervention arm, respectively) or at day 7 (-3.37 vs -3.44). Treatment did not reduce risk of hospitalization (7.1% control vs 5.9% intervention) nor shorten the time to complete resolution of symptoms (12 days, control vs 10 days, intervention). No relevant adverse events were reported. Conclusions. In patients with mild COVID-19, no benefit was observed with HCQ beyond the usual care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据