4.7 Article

Can Existing Improvements of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) in Urban Slums Reduce the Burden of Typhoid Fever in These Settings?

期刊

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 72, 期 11, 页码 E720-E726

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1429

关键词

water; sanitation; and hygiene; WASH; typhoid fever; protection; recursive partitioning

资金

  1. Diseases of the Most Impoverished Program of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1171432]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1171432] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that good household water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) practices were associated with lower typhoid risk. Additionally, the surrounding households' good WASH coverage was also linked to reduced risk, suggesting that improving WASH conditions could enhance typhoid control in disease-endemic populations.
Background: Sustained investments in water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) have lagged in resource-poor settings; incremental WASH improvements may, nonetheless, prevent diseases such as typhoid in disease-endemic populations. Methods: Using prospective data from a large cohort in urban Kolkata, India, we evaluated whether baseline WASH variables predicted typhoid risk in a training subpopulation (n = 28 470). We applied a machine learning algorithm to the training subset to create a composite, dichotomous (good, not good) WASH variable based on 4 variables, and evaluated sensitivity and specificity of this variable in a validation subset (n = 28 470). We evaluated in Cox regression models whether residents of good WASH households experienced a lower typhoid risk after controlling for potential confounders. We constructed virtual clusters (radius 50 m) surrounding each household to evaluate whether a prevalence of good WASH practices modified the typhoid risk in central household members. Results: Good WASH practices were associated with protection in analyses of all households (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], .37-.90; P = .015). This protection was evident in persons >= 5 years old at baseline (HR = 0.47; 95% CI, .34-.93; P = .005) and was suggestive, though not statistically significant, in younger age groups (HR = 0.61; 95% CI, .27-1.38; P = .235). The level of surrounding household good WASH coverage was also associated with protection (HR = 0.988; 95% CI, .979-.996; P = .004, for each percent coverage increase). However, collinearity between household WASH and WASH coverage prevented an assessment of their independent predictive contributions. Conclusions: In this typhoid-endemic setting, natural variation in household WASH was associated with typhoid risk. If replicated elsewhere, these findings suggest that WASH improvements may enhance typhoid control, short of major infrastructural investments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据