4.7 Article

Randomized Controlled Trial of Over-the-Scope Clip as Initial Treatment of Severe Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

期刊

CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
卷 19, 期 11, 页码 2315-+

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.046

关键词

Nonvariceal UGI Hemorrhage; Ulcer Bleeding; Dieulafoy's Lesion; Hemoclips

资金

  1. Endoscopic Research Award from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Foundation
  2. National Institutes of Health UCLA CURE: Digestive Diseases Research Core Center - Human Studies Core (National Institutes of Health National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases) [P30 DK41301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of using large OTSC versus standard hemostasis in the treatment of NVUGIB. Results showed that OTSC significantly reduced rates of rebleeding, severe complications, and post-randomization red cell transfusions, especially beneficial for patients with major stigmata of hemorrhage.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: No prior randomized controlled trial (RCT) has reported patient outcomes of large over-the-scope clip (OTSC) compared to standard hemostasis as initial endoscopic treatment of severe NVUGIB. This was our study aim. METHODS: Patients with bleeding ulcers or Dieulafoy's lesions and major stigmata of hemorrhage - SRH (active spurting bleeding, visible vessel, or clot) - or lesser SRH (oozing bleeding or flat spots with arterial blood flow by Doppler probe) were randomized to OTSC or standard endoscopic hemostasis (with hemoclips or multipolar electrocoagulation - MPEC). Patients and their healthcare providers were blinded to treatments and made all post-randomization management decisions. Ulcer patients received high dose intravenous infusions of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) for 3 days, then 27 days of oral PPI. 30 day outcomes were prospectively recorded; data management was with SAS; and data analysis was by a statistician. RESULTS: 53 patients (25 OTSC, 28 Standard) were randomized, with similar baseline risk factors. However, there were significant differences in OTSC vs. Standard groups in rates of rebleeding (4% vs. 28.6%; p = .017; relative risk 0.10, 95% confidence intervals 0.01, 0.91; number needed to treat 4); severe complications (0 % vs. 14.3%); and post-randomization units of red cell transfusions (0.04 vs. 0.68). All rebleeds occurred in patients with major SRH and none with lesser SRH. CONCLUSION: 1. OTSC significantly reduced rates of rebleeding, severe complications, and post-randomization red cell transfusions. 2. Patients with major stigmata benefited significantly from hemostasis with OTSC, but those with lesser stigmata did not.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据