4.5 Article

Ionic liquid catalyzed solvent-free synthesis of chalcone and its derivatives under mild conditions

期刊

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 160-166

出版社

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY PRESS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjche.2020.09.013

关键词

Ionic liquid; Chalcone; Aldol reaction; Kinetic model

资金

  1. Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [21890762]
  2. General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [21878293]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21676270]
  4. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDY-SSW-JSC011]
  5. K. C. Wong Education Foundation [GJTD-2018-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An ionic liquid (IL) catalyzed solvent-free process was developed for the direct synthesis of chalcone and its derivatives, with [Bmim]OH identified as the optimal IL with the highest yield and selectivity reaching up to 96.7% and 100%, respectively. A reaction mechanism-based kinetic model was established and regressed with experimental data, revealing the rate-controlling step as the beta-Hydroxylketone dehydrolysis with an activation barrier of 37.8 kJ.mol(-1).
An ionic liquid (IL) catalyzed solvent-free process was developed for the direct synthesis of chalcone and its derivatives by using substituted acetophenones and benzaldehydes via aldol reaction under mild conditions. A series of acidic and basic ILs were selected and screened. The influences of cations and reaction conditions on product yield and selectivity were systematically investigated. The [Bmim]OH was identified as the optimal IL, with the highest yield and selectivity reaching up to 96.7% and 100%, respectively. A reaction mechanism-based kinetic model was established and regressed with experimental data, revealing the beta-Hydroxylketone dehydrolysis with activation barrier of 37.8 kJ.mol(-1) was observed as the rate-controlling step. (C) 2020 The Chemical Industry and Engineering Society of China, and Chemical Industry Press Co., Ltd. All righs reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据