4.7 Article

Macroporous-mesoporous C-, S-, N-doped titania microspheres via the polyHIPE microspheres templates

期刊

CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 1135-1138

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.08.043

关键词

Porous titania microspheres; PolyHIPE microspheres; Hierarchical porous structure; Heteroatom doping; Photocatalysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51373160]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Doping and forming highly porous structures are effective ways to enhance the photocatalytic performances of TiO2 particles. The hierarchical porous C/S/N-TiO2 microspheres prepared using a new method show high visible-light catalytic efficiency and excellent cycling stability.
Doping and increasing specific surface area by forming highly porous structures are two effective ways to enhance the photocatalytic performances of TiO2 particles. Here for the first time, we report a new facile method to prepare the macroporous-mesoporous C-, S-, N-doped TiO2 (C/S/N-TiO2) microspheres via polyHIPE microspheres as templates. The chemical and crystalline structures of these hierarchical porous TiO2 microspheres are analyzed with FTIR, XPS, EDS, and XRD. The macroporous-mesoporous structures are confirmed with SEM observation and BET analysis. UV-vis DRS spectra analysis shows that the band gaps of C doped TiO2, C/N doped TiO2, C/S doped TiO2 and C/S/N doped TiO2 are estimated to be 3.07, 3.01, 2.94 and 2.81 eV, respectively, which are significantly narrower than that of TiO2 nanoparticles (3.23 eV). Photoluminescence spectra demonstrate that the recombination of electrons and holes in these macroporous-mesoporous TiO2 microspheres is also suppressed. The hierarchical porous C/S/N-TiO2 microspheres show high visible-light catalytic efficiency and excellent cycling stability to degrade RhB dye. (C) 2021 Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据