4.7 Review

Recent advances in synthesis of organosilicons via radical strategies

期刊

CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 1280-1292

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2020.09.058

关键词

Organosilicon; Radical silylation; Single electron transfer; Hydrogen atom transfer; Photoredox; Alkyl radical

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [30920021120]
  2. Key Laboratory of Biomass Energy and Material, Jiangsu Province [JSBEM201912]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21905089]
  4. Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M662775]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews the research progress in the synthesis of organosilicon compounds by free radical pathways since 2016, mainly achieved through the reaction of silyl radicals triggered by peroxide, transition-metal-induced peroxide decomposition, alkali, and photocatalysis.
Organosilicon compounds play an important role in the fields of materials science, pharmacy, and organic synthesis. The development of effective approaches for the preparation of these compounds have also become a research focus in organic synthesis. In recent years, free radical synthesis of organosilicons has been vigorously developed, which generally has the advantages of milder synthesis conditions, higher yields and selectivity, and free of precious metal catalysts compared with traditional strategies. This article reviews research progresses in the synthesis of organosilicon compounds by free radical pathways since 2016. In most cases, the radical silylation is achieved based on the reaction of silyl radicals, which are triggered by four routes including peroxide, transition-metal-induced peroxide decomposition, alkali, photocatalysis. The alkyl radicals can also initiate the radical silylation for the generation of C(sp(3))-Si bonds. (C) 2020 Chinese Chemical Society and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据