4.4 Article

Dynamic Response of 6MW Spar Type Floating Offshore Wind Turbine by Experiment and Numerical Analyses

期刊

CHINA OCEAN ENGINEERING
卷 34, 期 5, 页码 608-620

出版社

CHINA OCEAN PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s13344-020-0055-z

关键词

floating offshore wind turbine; dynamic responses; Spar type platform; FAST; model test

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51809170, 51879160]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFB1503700]
  3. Program for Intergovernmental International S&T Cooperation Projects of Shanghai Municipality [19160713600, 18160744000]
  4. Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning [ZXDF010037, ZXDF010040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT) is widely used for harvesting marine wind energy. Its dynamic responses under offshore wind and wave environment provide essential reference for the design and installation. In this study, the dynamic responses of a 6MW Spar type FOWT designed for the water depth of 100 m are investigated by means of the wave tank experiment and numerical analysis. A scaled model is manufactured for the experiment at a ratio of 65.3, while the numerical model is constructed on the open-source platform FAST (Fatigue, Aerodynamics, Structures, and Turbulence). Still water tests, wind-induced only tests, wave-induced only tests and combined wind-wave-current tests are all conducted experimentally and numerically. The accuracy of the experimental set-up as well as the loading generation has been verified. Surge, pitch and heave motions are selected to analyze and the numerical results agree well with the experimental values. Even though results obtained by using the FOWT calculation model established in FAST software show some deviations from the test results, the trends are always consistent. Both experimental and numerical studies demonstrate that they are reliable for the designed 6MW Spar type FOWT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据