4.8 Article

Nickel is a Different Pickle: Trends in Water Oxidation Catalysis for Molecular Nickel Complexes

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 13, 期 24, 页码 6629-6634

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202002164

关键词

homogeneous catalysis; nickel; structure-activity relationships; water oxidation; water splitting

资金

  1. Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM) Funding Source: Medline
  2. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of novel water oxidation catalysts is important in the context of renewable fuels production. Ligand design is one of the key tools to improve the activity and stability of molecular catalysts. The establishment of ligand design rules can facilitate the development of improved molecular catalysts. In this paper it is shown that chemical oxidants can be used to probe oxygen evolution activity for nickel-based systems, and trends are reported that can improve future ligand design. Interestingly, different ligand effects were observed in comparison to other first-row transition metal complexes. For example, nickel complexes with secondary amine donors were more active than with tertiary amine donors, which is the opposite for iron complexes. The incorporation of imine donor groups in a cyclam ligand resulted in the fastest and most durable nickel catalyst of our series, achieving oxygen evolution turnover numbers up to 380 and turnover frequencies up to 68 min(-1) in a pH 5.0 acetate buffer using Oxone as oxidant. Initial kinetic experiments with this catalyst revealed a first order in chemical oxidant and a half order in catalyst. This implies a rate-determining oxidation step from a dimeric species that needs to break up to generate the active catalyst. These findings lay the foundation for the rational design of molecular nickel catalysts for water oxidation and highlight that catalyst design rules are not generally applicable for different metals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据