4.7 Article

Extracellular electron transfer leading to the biological mediated production of reduced graphene oxide

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 256, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127141

关键词

Geobacter; Reduced graphene oxide; GO reduction; Extracellular electron transfer

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51709100, 51679084, 51579096]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [531107050936]
  3. National Innovative Talent Promotion Program of China [2017RA 2088]
  4. Funds for Innovative Province Construction of Hunan Province of China [2019RS3012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To explore a green, low-cost, and efficient strategy to synthesis reduced graphene oxide (RGO), the process and mechanism of the graphene oxide (GO) reduction by a model electrochemically active bacteria (EAB), Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA, were studied. In this work, up to 1.0 mg mL(-1) of GO was reduced by G. sulfurreducens within 0.5-8 days. I-D/I-G ratio in reduced product was similar to chemically RGO. After microbial reduction, the peak which corresponded to the reflection of graphene oxide (001) disappeared, while another peak considered as graphite spacing (002) appeared. The peak intensity of typical oxygen function groups, such as carboxyl C-O and >O (epoxide) groups, diminished in bacterially induced RGO comparing to initial GO. Besides, we observed the doping of nitrogen and phosphorus elements in bacterially induced RGO. In a good agreement with that, better electrochemical performance was noticed after GO reduction. As confirmed with differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) and cyclic voltammetry (CV) analysis, the maximum value of peak currents of bacterially induced RGO were significantly higher than those of GO. Our results showed the electron transfer at microbial cell/GO interface promoted the GO reduction, suggesting a broader application of EAB in biological mediated production of RGO. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据