4.1 Article

The trail-following pheromone of the termiteSerritermes serrifer

期刊

CHEMOECOLOGY
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 11-17

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00049-020-00324-2

关键词

Termite; Serritermes; Blattodea; Nonadecadienone; Inquiline; Trail-following pheromone

资金

  1. project EVA4.0 [CZ. 02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000803]
  2. CIGA [20184307]
  3. IGA FLD from the Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague [B_19_04]
  4. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico)
  5. Internal Grant Agency of Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences [20205014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Neotropical family Serritermitidae is a monophyletic group of termites with two genera, Serritermes and Glossotermes, each having unique lifestyles. The study revealed that both genera share the same trail-following pheromone component, distinguishing them from other termite families.
The Neotropical family Serritermitidae is a monophyletic group of termites including two genera,SerritermesandGlossotermes, with different way-of-life, the former being the sole obligatory inquiline among lower termites, while the latter is a single-site nester feeding on dry rotten red wood. Like the most advanced termite's family, the Termitidae, the Serritermitidae is an inner group of the paraphyletic family Rhinotermitidae, but unlike the Termitidae, it has been poorly studied so far. In this study, we bring new insights into the chemical ecology of this key taxon. We studied the trail-following pheromone ofSerritermes serriferand we identified (10Z,13Z)-nonadeca-10,13-dien-2-one as the only component of the trail-following pheromone of this termite species, as it is the case inGlossotermes, the other genus belonging to Serritermitidae. This result makes the family Serritermitidae clearly distinct from other Rhinotermitidae, such as the termitesPsammotermesandProrhinotermes, that use (3Z,6Z,8E)-dodeca-3,6,8-trien-1-ol and/or neocembrene as trail-following pheromones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据