4.6 Article

Dendritic Oligoglycerol Regioisomer Mixtures and Their Utility for Membrane Protein Research

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 7, 页码 2537-2542

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202003991

关键词

dendrons; detergents; membrane protein purification; oligoglycerol; regioisomers

资金

  1. Focus Area Nanoscale of the Freie Universitat Berlin
  2. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie (FCI)
  3. ERC [695511]
  4. Projekt DEAL
  5. Core Facility BioSupraMol of the Freie Universitat Berlin
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [695511] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dendrons, an important class of macromolecules, have been found to be more effective for protein extraction when using mixtures of oligoglycerol detergent regioisomers than individual regioisomers. The synthesis and characterization of these mixtures, along with their implementation into detergents, have been discussed, with experimental benchmarks provided for quality control. The unusual utility of these mixtures for extracting large protein quantities from biological membranes is investigated, with the anticipation that these findings will contribute to the development of mixed detergent platforms in the future.
Dendrons are an important class of macromolecules that can be used for a broad range of applications. Recent studies have indicated that mixtures of oligoglycerol detergent (OGD) regioisomers are superior to individual regioisomers for protein extraction. The origin of this phenomenon remains puzzling. Here we discuss the synthesis and characterization of dendritic oligoglycerol regioisomer mixtures and their implementation into detergents. We provide experimental benchmarks to support quality control after synthesis and investigate the unusual utility of OGD regioisomer mixtures for extracting large protein quantities from biological membranes. We anticipate that our findings will enable the development of mixed detergent platforms in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据