4.8 Article

Long-Term Cyclability of NCM-811 at High Voltages in Lithium-Ion Batteries: an In-Depth Diagnostic Study

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 32, 期 18, 页码 7796-7804

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02398

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Vehicle Technologies of the US Department of Energy through the Advanced Battery Materials Research Program (Battery500 Consortium) [DE-EE0007762]
  2. Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science of the US Department of Energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-nickel layered oxides, such as LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 (NCM-811), offer higher energy density than their low-nickel counterparts at a given voltage and are gaining major traction in automotive lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles. Besides high-Ni content, higher charging voltages above 4.3 V vs Li+/Li boost the energy and represent another focus in battery development. Here, we investigate the long-term cyclability of NCM-811 in graphite pouch cells over 1000 deep cycles between 2.5-4.2, 2.5-4.4, and 2.5-4.5 V through a suite of sensitive characterization techniques. The NCM-811 full cells show severely deteriorated cyclability with higher charging voltages, from 78% at 4.2 V to 52 and 32% at 4.4 and 4.5 V, respectively. At 4.2 V, minor parasitic electrolyte oxidation as well as cathode Li/Ni mixing and cracking are revealed after cycling, while transition-metal dissolution and surface reconstruction into rock-salt NiO are virtually undetectable. At 4.4 and 4.5 V, transition-metal dissolution and crossover to the anode become much more pronounced and a primary contributor to the capacity fade, while significant surface NiO formation causes substantial voltage polarization, which is less noticeable at 4.2 V. Meanwhile, more severe electrolyte oxidation, Li/Ni mixing, and particle pulverization exacerbate the voltage and capacity fade. These results outline distinct challenges for stable high-Ni layered oxide cathodes in high-voltage Li-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据