4.6 Article

CFD-DEM model study of gas-solid flow in a spout fluidized bed with an umbrella-like baffle

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 230, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2020.116234

关键词

Multistage spouting; Umbrella-like baffle; Spout fluidized bed

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP180101232, FT190100361]
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. Australian Research Council [FT190100361] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper identifies a new flow regime in a rectangular spout fluidized bed by applying an umbrella-like baffle, and studies it using the CFD-DEM approach. The new flow regime features multi-stage spouting, with first spouting and second spouting. The study explores the robustness, mixing efficiency, and formation mechanism of the multi-stage spouting pattern, showing improved efficiency and dynamic balance between the two spouts.
In this paper, a new flow regime is identified by applying an umbrella-like baffle in a rectangular spout fluidized bed and studied by Computational Fluid Dynamics-Discrete Element Method (CFD-DEM) approach. The simulations indicate the new flow regime features a multistage spouting - first spouting and second spouting. It is studied in aspects of spout robustness, mixing efficiency and formation mechanism. In the multistage spouting, the first spout and second spout always deflect but in opposite directions largely. This dynamic balance of the two spouts enables the high robustness in the multistage spouting pattern. Moreover, the efficiency of the gas-solid mixing is improved as four extra mesoscale particle circulations are formulated, reducing solids residence time in the dense region. The formation mechanism and regulation of the second spouting is also explored. It is indicated that the baffle opening angle of >60 degrees can ensure the continuum and compressible property of particle flow. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据