4.7 Article

A three-mode self-referenced optical thermometry based on up-conversion luminescence of Ca2MgWO6:Er3+,Yb3+phosphors

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 413, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127470

关键词

Up-conversion luminescence; Three-mode optical thermometry; Fluorescence intensity ratio; Fluorescence lifetime

资金

  1. NSFC [11974315]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of Ca2MgWO6:xEr3+, yYb3+ phosphor samples were synthesized through high temperature solid-state reaction method for optical thermometry. These samples showed intense up-conversion luminescence when excited by 980 nm laser, with enhanced emissions by addition of Yb3+ ions. The phosphors demonstrated a dual-mode temperature sensor and superior thermal stability, indicating potential applications for self-referenced optical thermometry.
To develop new up-conversion luminescent materials for optical thermometry, a sequence of Ca2MgWO6:xEr3+, yYb3+ phosphor samples were synthesized via high temperature solid-state reaction method. Their structure, morphology and luminescent performances were completely explored via X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and photoluminescence. Excited by 980 nm laser, all phosphor samples emit intense up-conversion luminescence of Er3+ at 531, 549 and 661 nm. Besides, these emissions were greatly enhanced with addition of Yb3+ ions. Benefiting from the different temperature dependence of three emission peaks, a dual-mode temperature sensor based on fluorescence intensity ratio (2H11/2/4S3/2 and 2H11/2/4F9/2) is realized by using single luminescent center. Meanwhile, the fluorescence lifetime of 4S3/2 state of Er3+ ions was used as the third temperature detection signal. More importantly, the phosphors exhibit superior thermal stability that will be helpful to obtain high precision temperature measurement. All results show that Ca2MgWO6:Er3+, Yb3+ samples could have potential applications for self-referenced optical thermometry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据