4.5 Article

CALYPSO structure prediction method and its wide application

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 406-415

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.037

关键词

Structure prediction; Swarm-intelligence algorithm; First principles

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11274136, 11404128]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2014M551181, 2014M550596]
  3. Young Teacher Innovation Funding in Jilin University [450060501393]
  4. Recruitment Program of Global Experts (the Thousand Young Talents Plan)
  5. Changjiang Scholar of Ministry of Education
  6. Changjiang Scholar and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT1132]
  7. CAEP-SCNS [R2014-03**]
  8. China 973 Program [2011CB808204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atomistic structure prediction from scratch is one of the central issues in physical, chemical, materials and planetary science, and it will inevitably play a critical role in accelerating materials discovery. Along this thrust, CALYPSO structure prediction method by taking advantage of structure smart learning in a swarm was recently developed in Prof. Yanming Ma's group, and it has been demonstrated through a wide range of applications to be highly efficient on searching ground state or metastable structures of materials with only the given knowledge of chemical composition. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the basic theory and main features of the CALYPSO method, as well as its versatile applications (limited only to a few works done in Ma's group) on design of a broad range of materials including those of isolated clusters/nanoparticles, two-dimensional reconstructed surfaces, and three-dimensional bulks (at ambient or high pressure conditions) with a variety of functional properties. It is to say that CALYPSO has become a major structure prediction technique in the field, with which the door for a functionality-driven design of materials is now opened up. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据