4.7 Article

Immunologically modified MnFe2O4 nanoparticles to synergize photothermal therapy and immunotherapy for cancer treatment

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 396, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125239

关键词

MnFe2O4 nanoparticles; Photothermal therapy; Immunotherapy; Immunoadjuvant; OVA

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61805161, 61805158, 61775145, 61525503, 61705143]
  2. Shenzhen Basic Research Project [JCYJ20170818143045740, JCYJ20190808150815084]
  3. U.S. National Institutes of Health [R01CA205348-01, RS20132225-106, R21 EB 015509-01]
  4. Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology [HR16-085]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Immunotherapy has been a promising candidate for cancer treatment. The combination of photothermal therapy (PTT) and immunotherapy have shown to cause tumor ablation and induce host immune response. However, this strategy is often hampered by a limited immune response and undesirable immunosuppression. In this work, we developed an immunologically modified nanoplatform, using ovalbumin (OVA)-coated PEGylated MnFe2O4 nanoparticles (NPs) loaded with R837 immunoadjuvant (R837-OVA-PEG-MnFe2O4 NPs) to synergize PTT and immunotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer. The designed R837-OVA-PEG-MnFe2O4 NPs are able to elicit significant immune responses in vitro and in vivo. MnFe2O4 NPs also allowed for a reduction of systemic immunosuppression through downregulation of M2-associated cytokines. More importantly, the R837-OVA-PEGMnFe(2)O(4) NPs under laser irradiation effectively inhibited tumor growth and prevented lung metastases, leading to a prolonged survival time and improved survival rate. In addition, the designed multitasking MnFe2O4 NPs showed as a desirable contrast agent for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to diagnose orthotopic breast tumor in vivo. Our work provides a novel strategy for combined PTT and improved immunotherapy in the treatment of breast and other metastatic cancers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据